Ever since casinos existed as a business, they have been surrounded by a shroud of mystery and controversy.
Various stories have emerged over the years about shady things going on in the field, both from the sides of players as well as, occasionally, casinos themselves. Some of those stand out above the others for various reasons, be it ingenuity, incredibility, or a simple combination of skills, luck, and the willingness to use all available resources to gain an edge.
When you’re playing at online casinos yourself you absolutely do NOT want controversy to happen so checkout a reputable casino like Dunder to get fast payouts and have of fun. In the meantime read on to find out our Top 5 Casino Controversies:
5) Ben Affleck was caught counting cards in Blackjack
Now, counting cards isn’t actually illegal and you can click here to find out how to do it. But most casinos do look down upon it, and will throw you out upon spotting you doing it. There’s hardly anything you can do to argue that decision, considering the casino is private property, and in some more extreme cases you may even be deprived of your winnings – thanks to a tiny clause buried somewhere in the casino’s terms of service.
One of the more notable incidents of card counting that went public involved none other than Ben Affleck. The actor was playing blackjack at the Hard Rock Las Vegas, when he was abruptly asked to leave and was additionally banned from the blackjack tables.
As can be expected, the media tried to make a huge scandal out of the incident, and many people did play into that narrative. However, Ben Affleck himself hardly seemed fazed. The actor spoke out about the incident after some time had passed, and stated that he felt no shame in what he did, considering it a fair move by anyone familiar enough with blackjack.
He added that other casinos were already familiar with his counting habit, and had no big issue with the actor playing in them as long as he stayed away from the blackjack tables. For the most part, those casinos were happy to have him as a guest as that added some extra credit to the casinos themselves.
Whether you agree with card counting or not, it’s impossible to prevent – and those who are patient enough to not reveal what they’re doing can usually end up quite ahead. The problem is coming back to the casino afterwards, as, like we’ve seen in Ben Affleck’s case, they are usually not too fond on letting known card counters back at their blackjack tables. Maybe some day the game will be made obsolete by another where the technique doesn’t work?
4) A gang of four was scamming roulette in Ohio
Normally, roulette is not a game you would consider cheatable. It’s purely mechanical and luck-based, so as long as the machine is properly designed and maintained, there should be no way to predict the outcome of a spin.
With a pair of sly hands though, you don’t need to do that, as a gang of four scammers in Ohio discovered. The “team” was relying on simple theft to pocket small amounts of chips from tables as they were playing, which they then handed off to accomplices in concealed locations away from the cameras’ eyes.
Stealing the chips without getting seen was the hard part, and they relied on many sly tricks to fool those around them. Considering they were able to make off with nicely stuffed pockets, they must have really had some quick fingers.
Then, they pretended to continue playing, and after stacking up enough chips from picking them off other tables, they cashed them in for money. The scam sounds simple enough, but in reality, had they kept it going in a more patient and controlled manner, they would have likely gotten away with it for a long time.
Even though casinos are tightly protected by security cameras and various other forms of technology these days, it can be surprisingly easy to circumvent some of those means if you’re clever and dedicated enough. Of course, it’s also a huge risk that doesn’t really end well for those that get caught for whatever reason.
It did take police some time to track them down and catch them as well, as it was hard to follow some of the leads. In the end, authorities were lucky that the crimes resurfaced some time after they had thought that it was all over.
3) Congratulations, you won $42,949,672! Not really, here’s a free steak dinner instead.
Modern slot machines are controlled by computers entirely, and while this adds a lot of convenience in operating them, it also poses some occasional issues due to the chance of bugs occurring. Katrina Bookman, who played at the Resorts World Casino in New York, learned that the hard way.
While playing on a slot machine, the woman was stunned to see the screen flashing the sum of $42,949,672.76. She quickly snapped a selfie with the unbelievable prize, and hurried off to claim it. However, she was enraged to discover that the casino refused to honor her winnings, claiming that it was a computer bug. They instead offered to “compensate” her with a free steak dinner, and a couple of dollars.
And while this may seem completely random, there is actually some method to this madness. Experienced programmers have pointed out that the sum of the woman’s prize, converted to bits, is suspiciously close to the limit of a certain numeric representation format used in computers.
What this means is that the machine most probably wanted to display a small sum on the screen – possibly even just a few cents – but due to a programming error, the number “rolled over” and went to the other edge of the limit.
Reports of a lawsuit were going around at the time, but unfortunately, the woman most likely has absolutely no case against the casino. Pretty much all casinos are tightly protected against such incidents in their clauses, absolving themselves of all responsibility related to computer problems.
There has been a lot of debate over the issue on the Internet, and Katrina Bookman even has a large number of supporters who stand by her side. Despite that, it’s highly unlikely that she’s going to see any kind of positive outcome from this, and the steak dinner she was offered is likely going to be the most she’s going to get in the form of compensation.
The only possible exception is if the casino decides to take pity on her to get some positive PR, but at this point even that’s highly unlikely.
2) Russian hackers drain casinos through their slot machines
A man walks into your casino and goes up to a slot machine. He starts playing, chatting idly on his phone while waiting for the next spin. He stays for some time – maybe fifteen minutes, maybe half an hour – and walks out. Then he comes back, keeps playing on the same machine, and walks out again. There was nothing suspicious about his playing the whole time he was there, but if you paid close attention, you would notice a few oddities.
For example, if you took a look at the logs from the machine he just played on, you’d discover that your casino was suddenly out a few major winnings. In fact, that guy didn’t lose a single spin while he was there!
Other than that, and the fact that he occasionally pointed his phone at the game screen as if he was taking a picture of it, there’s nothing seemingly odd with the way he played. So what happened?
In 2009, Russia decided to ban all gambling, including casinos. This resulted in a huge number of casinos selling all their equipment – including slot machines – at significant price reductions just so they could recoup some of their original investments.
Not all of those slot machines ended up in new casinos. Some of them found their way into the hands of a group of hackers, who spent a lot of time reverse engineering their software and looking for a hole. And their efforts eventually proved fruitful, leading them to the discovery of security holes in the random number generator of models like the Aristocrat Mark VI.
Random numbers are critical in computer-based slot machines, as they dictate everything about the outcome of your spin. Figuring out what number the machine is currently using, combined with the right kind of insecurely designed slot software, would give you the ability to predict exactly how your spin would go.
And that’s what Murat Bliev and his crew did. He would record short videos of the machine’s spins and send them back to an office in Russia, where specialists would analyze the video and quickly determine what “state” the game is in at the moment.
Afterwards, Murat’s phone would vibrate at the precise times he would need to spin the machine at, in order to get huge guaranteed winnings. Using this method, the team was able to score dozens of thousands of dollars in a single session, and they repeated the process over and over again.
That group was eventually attacked by authorities and significantly crippled, but the problem remains open for many casinos worldwide. How many more security flaws like that are out there, and how many of them have been discovered by organizations with no intention of making their knowledge public?
It’s costly for a casino to upgrade all of its machines to the latest models that encrypt everything about their operation, and sometimes they prefer to take a gamble with the potential losses. And to be fair, most of the time that gamble pays off. When it doesn’t though…
1) The man who tried to extort a casino with a bomb so clever, the FBI could do nothing to stop it
In August 1980, Harvey’s Resort Hotel was destroyed by a bomb placed in its casino. Nobody was hurt, as the FBI was well aware of the bomb ahead of time and were able to evacuate everyone. Not that the perpetrator intended to kill anyone, anyway – John Birges just wanted to get revenge on the casino for what he claimed was a $750,000 loss on an unlucky gambling streak.
He wanted $3,000,000 or he would blow up the casino – and he eventually did, although in an ironic streak of bad luck, poor communication prevented him from getting the ransom drop, which the FBI were actually reportedly prepared to make.
Why did they just let the bomb go off though? Surely a mastermind managing to concoct a machine so devious that it would stump even FBI experts is something that only exists in fiction. And yet, John Birges managed to always be one step ahead of the defusal experts.
The intended way to defuse the bomb was through a panel of 28 switches, of which just a few were the correct ones. Many of the others were rigged to instantly detonate the device.
The bomb could not be moved due to vibration and shock sensors, which would also trigger an immediate explosion. The FBI considered drilling through the frame of the machine to take a peek inside, but it was designed in such a way that doing so would complete the bomb’s circuit, again detonating it.
X-raying the device proved futile as well, as the inside was too complex to be successfully analyzed in time, even by the experienced eyes of the FBI’s specialists. The defusal experts even considered flooding the room to minimize the explosion damage, but Birges had even prepared for that. There was a device within the bomb that could detect rising water levels.
In the end, the bomb went off, and Birges was caught due to his son accidentally slipping and telling his then-girlfriend about the incident. Tempted by the reward money, she was quick to call the FBI.
Birges got a sentence in the end, but it’s hard to say if he really lost, despite not getting his money. It’s not hard to imagine him smiling in his cell, knowing what he did. And for what it’s worth, his “legacy” lives on in a way – the FBI is reportedly still using his original design in their training.